El SSD realmente es pésimo
/dev/sda:
Model=SMI MODEL , FwRev=20080308, SerialNo=SMI
00000403
Config={ HardSect NotMFM Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=7769/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=576, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPort, BuffSize=1kB, MaxMultSect=1, MultSect=?0?
CurCHS=7769/16/63, CurSects=7831152, LBA=yes, LBAsects=7831152
IORDY=no, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 *udma4
AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255)
Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-4* signifies the current active mode
root@mini:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 118 MB in 3.02 seconds = 39.13 MB/sec
root@mini:~# hdparm -T /dev/sda/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 424 MB in 2.00 seconds = 211.76 MB/secmini:~# hdparm -i /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Model=FUJITSU MHZ2120BH G2 , FwRev=00000009, SerialNo=
K60GT8927YSE
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=234441648
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
AdvancedPM=yes: mode=0x80 (128) WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: unknown: ATA/ATAPI-3,4,5,6,7* signifies the current active mode
mini:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 162 MB in 3.03 seconds = 53.40 MB/sec
mini:~# hdparm -T /dev/sda/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 446 MB in 2.00 seconds = 222.66 MB/sec
Un fujitsu SATA de 5400RPM… muchisimo mejor rendimiento… aun no he probado que tanto consume de batería extra, pero en cuanto a desempeño, es tremendo comparado con lo que cuesta un SDD.
Curiosamente aunque las velocidades que marca hdparm son cercanas el desempeño trabajando si es bastante notorio… a seguir probando… 120GB vs 4GB.